100twt.com

Sibling rivers, May–September 2009

The same table, pointed at other people

The top-100 table was the first river. By mid-May 2009 it had siblings on their own subdomains, each built the same way but fed by a different list of accounts. Some followed an institution. Two followed a place.

Lists before lists

Twitter didn't offer its own Lists feature until late 2009. Before that, the only timeline most people saw was the one built from the accounts they followed themselves. If you wanted to read what a newsroom or a city was saying, you had to follow every account in it and accept that they'd be mixed into everything else.

A river solved that from the outside. Someone picked the accounts, a script polled them, and the result was a public page that anyone could open without an account of their own. Nothing was ranked. The newest tweet went on top and the oldest fell off the bottom.

The chart below shows how different the rivers were in scale. Each dot is one account in a capture, placed by its follower count. The short vertical bar marks the median. The top 100 lived in the hundreds of thousands and millions. The city rivers lived in the hundreds.

101001K10K100K1M10MTop 100, Nov 2NYTTwitterGangBerkeleyTwins
Followers per account, log scale. Top 100 from the November 2, 2009 capture; rivers from their own captures (NYT and Twitter May 19, Gang May 20, Berkeley September 6, Twin Cities September 9, 2009).